Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ricochet Cafe's avatar

Thanks for all of the input! First, before we go further, I had one observation on Vince Foster. This is a very layered case, almost Shakespearean. On the one hand, it's a case of political intrigue. It's also a murder. But think of the relationships. Bill Clinton grew up with Vince Foster. As they both went out to conquer the world, both had success in different areas but their paths intersected. At times, Vince helped Bill (such as getting Hillary into the Rose Law Firm) and likely he helped with other matters (financial) as well. At times, Bill helped Vince, like bringing him into the White House. There was always scuttlebutt that Hillary and Vince were lovers, although I have no opinion on that matter (yet). So these are boyhood chums from smalltown America who hit the big time ... together...

And if I am looking at this correctly, the Clintons either directly or indirectly arrange for Foster's murder. Judging from what you're told us about Foster's mood and attitude around the time of his death, he wasn't expecting anything like this. He thought everything was fine--that's my impression. And then he's dead.

That kind of savage betrayal is almost breathtaking.

Do you see any indication that Foster was double-crossing the Clintons? It sure looks to me like Foster thought he was a Clinton loyalist.

Expand full comment
James Schumacher's avatar

An investigation into Foster’s death (and the death of Ron Brown) should be opened by the Trump DOJ because, as you’ve said, there’s no statute of limitation on murder and there is plenty to suggest both were murders that were, at a minimum, covered up by the Clintons and, at worst, instigated by the Clintons. Now it just so happens I can add a to your description of the suspicious circumstances surrounding Foster’s death and the aftermath.

1. Right after Foster’s death, dozens of people were interviewed, including Foster’s wife and other family members, close friends (like Web Hubble), staff at the White House, and even Bill Clinton. Every single one of them said Foster showed no signs of depression. Then a week after Foster’s death, thraee of those witnesses (VInce’s wife, Lisa, her sister, Sheila, and her sister’s husband) changed their stories 180 degrees. Where previously Lisa, for instance, told police there was no sign of depression and that Vince wasn’t taking an anti-depressant, she suddenly claimed the exact opposite. And this happened immediately after Lisa and Sheila met with Bill Clinton in the Whitehouse. Those three witnesses were used to prove that Foster was “clinically” depressed. The rest of the witnesses were completely forgotten, including Foster’s doctor who explicitly stated Foster was not “clinically” depressed. Neither Fiske or later Starr showed any interest in why these three witnesses suddenly changed their stories.

2) Regarding the briefcase and the so-called suicide note, Starr fail to mention in his report that there were witnesses (two paramedics and two motorists) who testified they saw a briefcase in Foster's car at Fort Marcy Park. A briefcase is certainly something that Starr should have been interested in … especially when Foster's briefcase showed up in his office at the Whitehouse later, supposedly containing the so-called suicide note. Curiously, the note was *discovered* almost simultaneous with the three key witnesses changing their story. Fiske and then later Starr said the note was proof Foster committed suicide but during the Starr investigation when three, nationally recognized handwriting experts came out to publicly challenge its authenticity, it suddenly disappeared from the official story. It was then discovered that the Park Police officer who had ruled it authentic did so based on less than reliable methods. In fact, he was later given portions of the note by Reed Irvine (of AIM), without knowing it, in a different form, and he himself judged it to be an obvious forgery. Starr not only stopped mentioning the note but showed no interest in how it managed to get into Foster’s briefcase. He showed no interest when it was proven that a number of Clinton staffers, who swore under oath that Hillary had no role in the handling of the note, had lied. A memo was discovered, written by White House lawyer Miriam Nemetz, who quoted then-White House chief of staff Mack McLarty saying Mrs. Clinton "was very upset and believed the matter [meaning the note] required further thought and the president should not yet be told.”  And with three nationally recognized, board certified independent handwriting experts announcing it was forgery … not even a good forgery, you'd think that would be news. But the New York Times and the Washington Post, the two newspapers which gave the most coverage to the discovery of the "suicide" note, ignored that. So did mainstream TV and most radio news programs, mainstream news magazines, and virtually every mainstream newspaper in the US. They were controlled media even then. They continued to write stories about the Foster case as though the suicide note was legit. 

3) Fiske’s investigation was so sloppy and corrupt that they were forced to convene a second investigation by Ken Starr. Starr’s investigation was so sloppy and corrupt that his own lead investigator on the case, Michael Rodriquez, quit, publicly calling the investigation a sham. His resignation letter said evidence was being overlooked in a rush to judgment. He wrote a 31 page memo to file detailing reasons why Starr’s investigation was phony. Starr just ignored it. The mainstream media ignored it. The mainstream media also ignored every effort Rodriguez made to be interviewed. One of the reasons Rodriguez gave was that he personally saw photos of wounds that did not match the official description. He said there was a wound in Foster’s neck that the official version totally ruled out. Those photos have never been publicly released and the government has resisted every effort to get them released. Trump should now see to it that they're released. There is no legitimate reason not to do so.

4) Related to the above, there was a FBI memo written to the Director of the FBI by agents at the scene two days after Foster’s death which stated the shot was fired into Foster's mouth WITHOUT leaving an exit wound. This is completely contrary to the official claim that there was a gaping 1” by 1-1/2” hole in the back of Foster’s head. Starr failed to tell the three judge panel monitoring his activities, as well as the public, about this memo. And not one of the DOZENS of eyewitnesses at Marcy Park or the morgue (including a doctor, the EMTs, and Park Police) corroborated the official claim. In fact, they either said they saw no exit wound at all or that they saw a wound in Foster’s neck. Only the doctor who did the “official” autopsy, Dr Beyer, reported this gaping hole. Starr reported this doctor’s findings and ignored the other 25 witnesses. That’s a bit suspicious, especially when Dr Beyer was caught outright lying about the X-ray machine being broken (which is the excuse given for why there were no x-rays taken of Foster’s head).

5) Rodriguez’s memo also noted that witness statements were not accurately represented in FBI reports. For example, there is clear evidence that either the FBI or Fiske tampered with Lisa Foster’s statement to the FBI the night of Foster’s death. Fiske and Starr claimed in their reports, based on a typed FBI form, that Lisa said her husband was "fighting depression". But the handwritten FBI notes from that night clearly show she told the investigators he was "fighting prescription", a reference to the sleeping pills dispensed for insomnia by Foster’s doctor. But “fighting depression" was all Fiske and Starr ever mentioned. Either the FBI lied to them or, more likely, they lied.

See continuation 1 …

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts