Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Schumacher's avatar

This is another super article and analysis.

Great point about Biden saying he’s a “transitional president”. I think it means what you suggest.

However, regarding the question of whether the democRATS can steal this election, I wouldn’t be so sure it’s now difficult, much less impossible. They don’t really have to rig up any ballots if they control the counting, which to a large extent they still do. When they control the bulk of the media, which they still do. When they control nearly every government agency responsible for preventing election fraud, which they still do. When they control the courts, which they still do for the most part. Given all that, they can simply declare whoever they are running the winner no matter how many ballots were actually cast. They can make up any numbers they like the election result … tell the public 132 million for the democRAT candidate and 130 million for evil Trump. Then they use the courts, FEC, DOJ and UNIPARTY members in local governments to prevent enough recounts to prove the steal.

Meanwhile, they propagandize the people with the media again and use the DOJ, the FBI, the Intel Services, state police, the national guard, and military to intimidate and threaten any of the populace and any politicians who object to the steal ... like they did the first time, only on steroids this time. It won’t work in every state but it might work in enough. And behind the scenes they bribe, blackmail or outright threaten the majority of the Republican leadership … literally threaten their lives and families if they pursue the matter. So the same thing happens this time as last time, except this time there’s no Trump waiting in the wings. Then the long dark Fabian night descends on America.

If that happened, what would the majority of the Republican Party do? For the most part, I think they’d fold like they always have. And what would MAGA supporters do? Sure, some would protest, but would enough? I got tossed off a VERY conservative forum (Conservative TreeHouse) for suggesting we use mass protests (by millions of conservatives willing to disrupt the movement of goods, water, power, etc) BEFORE the election to force the changes we all know are needed to insure the election process is secure and trustworthy. To ensure those protests weren’t stopped by the police and Feds, I suggested we discuss exercising our Second Amendment Rights to put armed people in the protests to intimidate police back. I suggested no violence other than disrupting the flow of food, water, etc to democRAT strongholds. Otherwise, I was a model member of the forum, making a lot of inciteful (I believe) posts, never using foul language or being discourteous. The moderators of CTH called me a J6 Fed, outright lied about things I'd posted, then tossed me off the forum, even preventing me from emailing them to complain about the treatment. And ever since, the Second Amendment has rarely been mentioned on CTH (I know because I still monitor it … it’s a great source of information on the Deep State). My point is that if a site like CTH is so afraid of being realistic about the situation, how likely is it that our side has a backup plan to do something effective should the democRATS/UNIPARTY do what I suggest they may do this time around? I think it’s next to zero for all the big tough talk conservatives (at forums like CTH and elsewhere) spout.

Now I hope I’m wrong and you’re right, that the UNIPARTY now can’t steal the election, but as Sundance (owner of CTH) has repeatedly said … there are TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS of dollars at stake for the Deep State and they’ve weaponized the government against us. Plus they know they could literally “hang” for what they’ve done (as Hillary reportedly suggested in 2016) should Trump win). And they’ve engaged in a lot more illegalities since then so they even more reason to be worried. They are truly desperate … so desperate that I suspect THEY do have a contingency plan should the vote look like it’s going to be unfavorable ... one that will push the boundaries far beyond what conservatives seem to expect.

Sure, it would have been easier to simply eliminate Trump at Butler or some future event, but now that might be much more difficult, I can’t imagine that they (folks who privately boasted among themselves about having a back up plan in 2016 should Trump win … the lawfare and bogus impeachment efforts they used after he did) don’t have another plan now using all the power they still have to stay in control. That back up plan won't be more lawfare and another impeachment since that didn't work the first time. So I fear we are in for quite a ride and only the fortitude that maybe 3 to 4 percent of the conservative population have might save us. But then it was 3 to 4 percent of the populace that defeated the British military and created this great country. Right?

Expand full comment
Judy Bowman's avatar

Wow...

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts