Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Schumacher's avatar

Part 24

Now I want to say one last thing about this case. Nearly 30 years has passed since Brown died and the whistleblowers came forward. It’s really too bad that Newsmax has none of the many articles they published in its archive. For example …

"Experts Differ on Ron Brown's Head Wound" By Christopher Ruddy, FOR THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW, December 3, 1997 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1997/12/03/35938

"Second Expert: Brown's Wound Appeared to be From Gunshot" By Christopher Ruddy, FOR THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW, December 9, 1997 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1997/12/09/34206

"Wecht: Autopsy Needed in Brown Case" by Christopher Ruddy, FOR THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW, December 17, 1997 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1997/12/17/32921

"Pathologists Dispute Claims in Brown Probe" by Christopher Ruddy, FOR THE PITTSBURGE TRIBUNE-REVIEW, January 11, 1998 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/1/11/32000

"Fourth Expert Claims Probe of Brown's Death Botched" by Christopher Ruddy, FOR THE PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW, January 13, 1998 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/1/13/173306

"Kathleen Janoski Describes Cover-Up in Ron Brown Investigation" By Carl of Oyster Bay, FOR THE WASHINGTON WEEKLY, April 26, 1998 http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/4/26/01704

I can still find posts I made on political forums 15 years ago of me linking and quoting large sections from them to others, with no-one remarking that they didn't exist. It may true that the internet never forgets anything but I don’t seem to have the means to locate everything that was once available. Maybe someone else does and were this officially investigated (say by Trump's FBI), I'm sure they'd have no trouble locating everything that's was once available.

But even so, one can still find enough sources to confirm most everything I’ve reported here. Here are to begin that process (they’re not in chronological order):

https://www.cashill.com/archive/ronbrown/ronbrown2006_2.htm “Ron Brown: 10 Years and No Questions”

https://www.wnd.com/1998/01/3178/ “Were Brown X-rays purposely destroyed”

https://www.wnd.com/2004/05/24592/ (Was Ron Brown murdered, and, if so, how and by whom?”

https://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/BROWN/bullet.html “The Bullet Hole” (Images of the brown skull x-rays and entrance wound photo Janoski took)

https://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/BROWN/brown.php “NEW! Was there a bullet hole in Ron Brown's head?”

https://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/ois/cases/other/ronbrown/rbrown.htm “PETITION TO ORDER CONTINUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION INTO MATTERS RELATED TO FORMER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE RONALD H. BROWN”

https://rense.com/politics6/bullet.htm “The Unexplained Bullet Wound In Ron Brown's Head”

https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/brownupdate.html “Report from Washington”

https://rumble.com/v2cmll4-clinton-associate-ron-browns-1996-plane-crash-with-a-bullet-hole-in-head.html “Clinton associate Ron Brown's 1996 plane crash with a bullet hole in head” (a video)

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/dec/05/army-examiner-disputes-results-from-autopsy-on/ “Army Examiner Disputes Results From Autopsy On Ron Brown”

https://www.wnd.com/2004/05/24554/ “The bullet hole that should have shaken Washington”

http://buchal.com/library/coverups/ronbrown.htm “The Botched Ron Brown Investigation: An Interview with AFIP Forensic Photographer Kathleen Janoski”

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.dear.whitehouse/c/VIS-2F2FK5M “Limbacher: Kathleen Janoski Describes Cover-Up in Ron Brown Investigation” (another Janoski interview)

https://www.wnd.com/2004/05/24570/ “How Monica buried Ron Brown and saved the Clinton presidency”

https://www.wnd.com/2001/01/7749/ “Revealed: Gun lost on fatal Brown flight”

https://www.cashill.com/archive/ronbrown/what_barack_obama.htm “What Barack Obama Ought To Know About Ron Brown”

https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1997/12/25/murder-theory-concerning-brown-death-refuses-to-die/ “Murder theory concerning Brown death refuses to die” (many instances of the government demonstrably lying)

https://www.wnd.com/1998/02/3197/ “Ron Brown whistleblowers pay price”

https://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/archive/index.php?thread-1222.html “Was Ron Brown Assassinated? Experts Differ on Ron Brown's Head Wound by Christopher Ruddy”

http://pages.suddenlink.net/anomalousimages/images/news/news141.html “Military Imposes Gag Order In Ron Brown Controversy”

https://www.wnd.com/1997/12/1013/ “Ron Brown's body must be exhumed”

https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/08/justice.brown/index.html “Justice Concludes No Evidence Of Crime In Ron Brown Death” (Janet Reno and CNN whitewashing the controversy)

There are others sources, some behind paywalls. Often the ones behind them (like The Washington Post's) read like efforts to cover up a murder rather than get to the truth.

The End

Expand full comment
James Schumacher's avatar

Part 23

The Newsmax article then said

——————

“While newsrooms pretend that any evidence of a real-life Brown cover-up is too bizarre to be taken seriously, CBS's "fictional" presentation of the same information made for some devastatingly plausible drama. And lest anyone missed the Clinton connection, "Hayes" writers had this line delivered by David Caruso himself: "It's one thing to dodge the accusations of a kiss and tell intern. It's quite another to have corruption in your Cabinet and commit murder to cover it up."

How did the producers of "Michael Hayes" get away with airing so much embargoed information about the Brown case? "Hayes" production assistant Dave Rapp told the Washington Weekly that everyone on the set, including Caruso, well understood that the story they were telling was Ron Brown's. Says Rapp: "I knew because our original version, our original drafts did refer specifically to Ron Brown. I'm sure, though I don't know specifically, that the first version was negated by CBS people who fictionalized it."

Even though "Michael Hayes" producers had to pretend they were dealing in fiction to do it, they managed to get more of the Ron Brown story broadcast on television than any network newsroom had dared to try. Then again, network newsrooms have never been much interested in investigating strange and mysterious Clinton administration deaths.

The "Michael Hayes" show ends as the central character comes to the conclusion that a high ranking government official--a Cabinet member--was murdered for political reasons. Hayes turns to a bust of Lincoln that he keeps in his office and laments: "It's not our country anymore, Mr. President." This is a sentiment not unfamiliar to those who have witnessed six years worth of White House criminality with no justice in sight. Hayes finally resigns from his job under pressure. In the final scene, Michael Hayes is viewed through the crosshairs of a rifle scope.

—————

The article ended by stating “CBS has canceled ‘Michael Hayes.’”

And it did … just one episode later. Just a coincidence?

Continued in Part 24

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts