Contrails, Chemtrails, Off the Rails

Weather Modifications, Part 2

Climate change is a global grift, designed to encourage people to cede their rights, money, and autonomy to global forces who will protect them from an imaginary bogeyman. Those who perpetuate climate panic are quick to point out that even the most extreme efforts to reduce carbon emissions to combat global warming will have negligible effect on the devastation of climate change. That’s why we need geo-engineering, the euphemism for weather modification.

It’s just a hop, skip, and a jump from geo-engineering to a one-world government.

The United States (U.S.) pushes geo-engineering more than most other nations, but geo-engineering does not really recognize national boundaries. For instance, what if our nation could geo-engineer itself into a better climate but at the expense of causing drought or famines somewhere else? Or what if our nation decided to mess with the weather over certain parts of the country but not others? For instance—and this is just hypothetical, of course—what if our Democrat overlords could punish Red states with hurricanes or tornadoes while allowing Blue states to have ideal weather?

John Brennan, one time head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the guy who may have buried Obama’s Indonesian passport, spoke in front of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 2016 about the value of aerosol spraying. You don’t even have to know what aerosol spraying is about to get the heebie-jeebies about this one. But let’s talk about stratospheric aerosol injections (SAI).

If you spray certain aerosol substances into the atmosphere, it could have a modest cooling effect on the earth’s temperature. It is estimated that effective SAI spraying could cool the earth by 1 degree Celsius, which is less than 2 degrees Fahrenheit. So summer in Texas could be 96 degrees Fahrenheit instead of 98. An aerosol is made when particles are suspended in a gas that allows them to be injected or “flown” in to a destination. When you have a bad cold and you sneeze, your cold germs become aerosolized (suspended in your saliva and then propelled on unsuspecting people.) In the case of SAI, they use sulfate aerosols involving particles of sulfate dioxide (SO2). The idea is that the SAI will deflect solar heat. What could go wrong? Well, a lot of things.

• SAI only lasts as long as you keep doing it. If a program of SAI was carried out in a region and then stopped suddenly, the area would undergo a phenomenon called “termination shock.” That doesn’t sound good, does it? It means the temperatures would spike up and not by a measly 1 or 2 degrees. Imagine you’re in an oven

• SAI could be forced to shut down for any number of reasons—war, lack of funding, political disagreements, changes in leaderships, and so on

• SAI is known to deplete the ozone layer. Remember back in the 1980s when everyone worried about the hole in the ozone layer? It healed itself, but SAI has a dangerous effect on it

• SAI can stop rainfall, which can result in prolonged droughts and famines

• SAI spray changes the sky from a vibrant blue to a very pale washed-out blue

Now this makes me think you could weaponize SAI by using it in a controlled way to inflict famines on enemies. Stalin had his Holodomor in Ukraine (forced starvation of millions of Ukrainians), I guess John Brennan is intrigued by the high-tech version.

But what if we sprayed other substances, say carcinogens? Well, that leads us to chemtrails versus contrails.

It’s quite common these days to see puffy white trails behind airplanes. The authorities (the same ones who told us that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation and that Trump wants to terminate the Constitution) tell us that these are made up mostly of water vapor. They call them “contrails” (short for condensation trails) and say they are normal. Other people say they are spraying chemicals and call them “chemtrails.” Nearly everyone in authority tends to vociferously debunk chemtrails, which alone makes me suspicious. About 20% of the American population believes that the white lines we see all of the time in the sky are not condensation but involve something else.

Contrails do exist, so it is easy to just say everything in the sky is a contrail. But chemtrails are not a “baseless conspiracy theory” and even CNN admits this. First, consider the U.S. government itself which published via its Defense Technical Information Center a paper on “Weather as a Force Multiplier.” Fully declassified now, this 1996 paper talks about using weather modifcation to win wars. It even declares weather control will “shape the battlefield” of the future. Here’s the link. These military think-tank guy says that weather modification is a “high-reward endeavor” and nations not involved in weather modification efforts are putting themselves at high risk. Weather modification very often involves spraying chemicals into the atmosphere.

And if you’re not sure that weather modification is real, check out Google Patents. Just put that in the Google search engine. Now you have a search engine of patents. Type in “weather modification” or other terms and you’ll see the relevant patents. It’s not easy to get a patent. You need a valid invention, a team of attorneys, and a lot of time to get through all of the bureaucratic obstacles.

And many countries have been using airplanes to spray dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere for years!

During the Cold War, the United Kingdom conducted about 750 “mock chemical warfare attacks.” During these fake attacks, they sprayed the unwitting general public with zinc cadmium sulfate. The fiends who thought up this plan chose zinc cadmium sulfate because it’s a teeny-tiny molecule that isn’t much bigger than a germ. They were likely testing how efficiently they could spray lethal pathogens on civilians during war. Furthermore, zinc cadmium sulfate glows under ultraviolet light, so they could see the results of their handiwork. They claimed that when they conducted these tests, they chose zinc cadmium sulfate because they thought it was harmless. Turns out it causes cancer. Oh well.

And before you say that is just the crazy Brits doing those tests, the U.S. conducted the same drills with the same substances before the U.K. ever did—the U.S. sprayed these same substances on the public in the 1950s and 1960s. So if you say there is no such thing as chemtrails, well, then what do you call using an airplane to spray a carcinogen on random people?

Somebody asked Alexa, the spooky AI answer-bot, about chemtrails and was told, “Chemtrails are being sprayed across the entire planet, not just here in America, to accomplish many goals. The main one is to reduce human population of the earth.” Well, Politifact practically tripped over its own two feet to debunk this claim, which is sort of comical. They couldn’t debunk the fact that this really happened. It did. That’s what Alexa said. They had to debunk Alexa and they said she was giving out misinformation. I guess in our age of government duplicity, even our bots are conspiracy theorists.

While the U.S. mainstream media ranks chemtrails as an unmitigated and utterly baseless conspiracy theory, the European Parliament does not share that belief. In fact, they have officially entertained the question as to whether chemtrails are harmful to health and might cause cancer, heart disease, or Parkinson disease. That’s funny, seeing as they don’t exist.

This April 2024, Tennessee passed a law that bans chemtrails, well, they put it this way: they forbid the “intentional injection, release, or dispersion” of chemicals into the air” and notes they are used to affect temperature, weather, and solar intensity. Texas is considering such a law but is being mocked for hating science.

The mainstream media routinely debunks this stuff, mocking those who ask questions as “conspiracy theorists” and rounding up a bunch of unnamed scientists who 98% agree with their findings. (Those who work with scientists know them to be a contentious lot; 98% of them do not agree on anything. Put two scientists in a room together and you’ll get three opinions. The phrase “a consensus of scientists” is an oxymoron.) However, if we harken back to the Vietnam War, the U.S. government routinely sprayed a herbicide and defoliant known as Agent Orange on the country as part of Operation Ranch Hand. We did this for ten years, from 1961 to 1971. The British have used Agent Orange as well, in Malaysia. It addition to wreaking environmental havoc (and likely causing food insecurity, hunger, and famine), it also caused birth defects and catastrophic health consequences. Vietnam says that 3M of its people suffered serious illness because of Agent Orange. Agent Orange proves that chemtrails exist.

We’ve also sprayed Agent Orange in the United States, but for other purposes. It was used in the 1940s to help clear land for industrialized farms and railroads. Those were chemtrails.

So it’s definitely not “baseless” to ask if the weird stuff we see in the sky might not be chemtrails. It reminds me of when the mainstream media said any claim that the 2020 election was not pristine was “baseless.”

Then there is a story from NASA that they do “occasionally” spray lithium and other chemicals in the earth’s upper atmosphere, but strictly for scientific purposes. I guess it’s not a chemtrail if you do it in the same of science. NASA claims that the lithium would not reach those on earth and, even if it did, the quantities would be too small to affect people. The liberal FactCheck.org site claims that the NASA people don’t know what they’re talking about, since chemtrails “has been debunked.” In other words, chemtrails aren’t real, and NASA is spewing misinformation.

Well, NASA is spraying lithium around but no one knows why. The official reason for lithium chemtrails is that NASA wants to research how neutral particles and charged particles affect each other in the atmosphere, since this could affect satellite transmissions. This may sound plausible to you and me, but it sounds goofy to scientists, who say that lithium is not really a good substance to study how charged and neutral particles would interact. In fact, one scientist at NASA even said if that was the kind of testing you wanted to do, lithium is not what you would use.

NASA has done this to us before: they conduct tests out in the open and admit it, they just don’t own up to what the test is really about. NASA guys are pretty big on pulling the wool over the eyes of the people who fund them. Remember how UFOs were totally fake until they were totally real?

There are few “conspiracy theories” as hotly “debunked” as chemtrails, even though we know that spraying chemicals to seed clouds, modify the weather, deflect sunlight, and conduct war have absolutely occurred. So these things that do not exist now have existed in the past.

Makes me suspicious.